Posts Tagged ‘crime labs’

Houston’s Gun Testing Also Backed Up

Monday, February 1st, 2010

The news of Houston’s rape kit backlog has been widespread and public outrage at the delays has even resulted in the state bringing in independent researchers to help speed up the process. But now new reports have emerged saying the Houston PD is lagging on their forensic testing of gun evidence as well.

The Houston Chronicle has reported that over 300 guns are waiting to be tested as well. The lab director has defended her team by explaining that new staff members are on the way and that in a little over a year, robotics will help speed up the testing process even more. She says their current priorities are crimes that involved violence and crimes where suspects have already been identified.

Houston criminal lawyers seem to agree that while the backlog is disappointing, the police department has set its priorities right, as testing evidence in cases with suspects can help reduce the number of persons wrongly charged and arrested for crimes.

Image via Svadilfari [Flickr]

Houston Oks Contracts to Process Rape Kits

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

The city of Houston has approved a contract to process over 4,000 rape kits that have been currently backlogged. The contracts will go to four separate companies and cost the city $4.2 million dollars. The contracts will last three years and include two options for one-year extensions.

Unfortunately, the backlogs will have to wait a while, because only $475,000 has been allocated for this fiscal year. For now, the Houston Police Department is expected to prioritize their cases in order to process the most important and pressing matters first, particularly those where suspects have already been identified. Houston criminal attorneys say these are the most critical situations because they also may help release innocent suspects from wrongful accusations.

The huge backlog has been able to pile up as the police forensics department has been understaffed for some time.

To read more about the issue, see the article in the Houston Chronicle. Image via NobMouse [Flickr].

Ex-Lab Employee Accuses Dallas Crime Lab of Sloppiness

Thursday, October 29th, 2009

A disgruntled ex-employee of the Southwestern Institute of Forensic Science, Dallas County’s crime lab, has filed suit against his past employer, accusing the institute of “slip-shod analysis” and “sloppy science.” Dr. Chris Nulf, a forensic biologist, claims the labs use expired chemicals in testing procedures, that the lab failed to secure case files, and that a box fan blew over lab areas where evidence was examined. Nulf was fired in May, for what the SWIFS claimed to be “unsatisfactory performance.” However, he says he was let go after repeatedly pointing out problems with the laboratory to his superiors.

lafaesofaDallas County District Attorney Craig Watkins says prosecutors will be required to re-examine a number of closed cases if Nulf’s accusation’s are correct. “Our ultimate goal is to seek the truth. If there’s an indication that something was done improperly, then we will take the appropriate measures to make sure we rectify it.”

The lab is not the first to be in the line of fire over the last few years. Crime labs in Houston, Fort Worth, and the Texas Department of Safety’s lab have all been accused of shoddy practices in the past. Experts believe it is most likely due to the relative lack of regulations over the labs themselves. There is no government body to oversee or inspect them and a proposed law requiring spot checks on the labs recently died in the legislature. Still, Nulf’s lawsuit could prove to have an immediate effect on labs throughout the state as Houston criminal attorneys and others begin to question the credibility of the lab evidence itself.

To read more about Nulf’s lawsuit, see the article on WFAA. Image Via lofaesofa [Flickr]

Convicted Rapist Given New Trial

Monday, October 19th, 2009

ynseA convicted rapist from Harris County will be given a new trial for his crimes based on the destruction of DNA evidence by the Houston police crime lab. Lawrence J. Napper was arrested for the raping a six year old boy in 2001 after already having three rape convictions on his record. When the child was asked to identify Napper in a line up, he was able to, but when he was asked to do so in the courtroom, he was unable to identify the suspect.

DNA evidence was said to have pointed to Napper’s guilt, but his court-appointed defense attorney was unable to independently test the evidence because the Houston police had used the entire sample in their lab. While it seems the crime analysts had a lack of understanding of DNA evidence, his attorney at the time was not knowledgeable enough about the subject to thoroughly cross examine the lab technicians.  Napper was sentenced to life in prison without parole, but has continued to maintain his innocence. His chance at a new trial may exonerate him for the crime.

Napper’s current Houston criminal lawyer, BobWicoff said, “This is what we had hoped for, Judge Barr recognized the injustice of a crime lab destroying the only available forensic evidence in the case before Napper was even arrested, much less being given an attorney or his own expert.”

To read more, see the article in the Houston Chronicle. Image via ynse [Flickr]